You audit legal and vendor invoices for accuracy, allowability, and apparent overbilling β a careful second set of eyes that gives the client a clear view of items worth a closer look.
Servicers, asset managers, and default law firms managing referrals who suspect they're overpaying but can't prove where.
Overbilling, duplicate charges, and non-allowable line items quietly drain recovery. Without a specialist reviewing them, they just get paid.
A mock vendor invoice with line items, a βflagβ column, and a β$X flaggedβ total β synthetic vendor and amounts.
A client forwards a stack of attorney and vendor invoices they've been paying without really checking. You go line by line, comparing against allowables and the engagement terms, and you note things worth a closer look β a possible duplicate, a likely non-allowable, a rate that looks high for the engagement. You total it up and send the worksheet. Now the client has a clear view of what may need a second look β and you've shown the value of a careful specialist.